Living Histories Web Project Rubric

Students _____________________________ & _____________________________

The descriptors below are summaries; it is assumed you have read and followed the original directions.	10 Above Expectations—I’m in awe of you. You attended to every detail with precision.	9-8 Good, at expectations—some minor problems distract; your work is less precise than it could be.	7 Good attempt, not quite meeting expectations—several deviations exist. Attention to detail is limited.	6-5 Not really—you misunderstood the expectations, or too many mistakes or omissions exist.	0 You didn’t do this at all, or your attempt is so poor, so limited that no points are given.
The title and table of contents pages are complete and well organized.
The prologue meets expectations given in the original directions.
The epilogue meets expectations given in the original directions.
The annotated bibliography correctly lists all sources according to MLA format, and annotations are complete and easy to understand.
The ten hyperlinks imbedded into the text of the project take the reader to relevant information that adds to understanding.
The overall presentation quality of our project is inviting, easy to read and easy to navigate. All our hyperlinks work.
The photograph is placed logically and enhances the project.

	10 Detailed, insightful—well developed. Well organized, logical. Very easy to follow. No or very few convention errors. Strong Voice—sounds convincing; I can feel it.	9-8 Good details, less insightful. Good organization, logical overall. A few convention errors. Good voice—not as powerful as 10.	7 Details are generally good; insight is limited. Development is limited. Organization is generally good, but may be confusing at times. Convention errors are noticeable. Voice is strained or stilted.	6-5 Details are limited or redundant. The writing is not insightful. Development is poor. Organization is confusing or illogical. Convention errors impair readability. Voice is absent. Anyone could have written this piece.	0 This piece is absent from the project or is so poor an attempt that no points are given.
Historical Overview This piece x 2
Interview Transcript This piece x 2
Genre page #1 Genre type:
Genre page #2 Genre type:
Genre page #3 Genre type:
Genre page #4 Genre type:
Totals: ______/ 150

Overall Comments: