Multi-Genre Web
Rubric
Student ________________________________________________________
|
10 Above Expectations—I’m in
awe of you. You attended to every detail with precision. |
9-8 Good, at expectations—some
minor problems distract; your work is less precise than it could be. |
7 Good attempt, not quite
meeting expectations—several deviations exist. Attention to detail is
limited. |
6-5 Not really—you mis-understood the expectations, or too many mistakes or
omissions exist. |
0 You didn’t do this at all,
or your attempt is so poor, so limited that no points are given. |
Title page includes: ·
title (not
label) ·
your first name
only ·
the date (due
date) · teacher & course name ·
a link to your
index page · a link to the table of contents page · a link to your webfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
Table of contents page is
complete and well organized. |
|
|
|
|
|
The opening/prologue meets
expectations given in the original directions. |
|
|
|
|
|
The epilogue/closing meets
expectations given in the original directions. |
|
|
|
|
|
The annotated bibliography
correctly lists all sources according to MLA format, and annotations are
complete and easy to understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are five hyperlinks
imbedded into the text of my genre pages. They are to relevant information
that adds to my piece. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have used repetend to create unity in my multigenre
project; it is recognizable and effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
The overall presentation
quality of my project is inviting, easy to read and easy to navigate. All my
hyperlinks work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Well organized, logical.
Very easy to follow. No or very few convention
errors. Detailed, insightful—well
developed. Strong Voice—sounds
convincing. |
9-8 Good organization, logical
overall. A few convention errors. Good details, less
insightful. Good voice. |
7 Organization is generally
good, but may be confusing at times. Convention errors are
noticeable. Details are good; insight is
limited or absent. Develop-ment is limited. Voice is strained or
stilted. |
6-5 Organization is confusing or
illogical. The piece is hard to follow. Convention errors impair the
readability. Details are limited or
redundant. Voice is absent. Anyone
could have written this piece. |
0 This piece is absent from
the project or is so poor an attempt that no points are given. |
Genre page #1 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #2 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #3 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #4 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #5 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #6 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Genre page #7 Genre type: |
|
|
|
|
|
Totals: ______/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Comments: